CHAMPAIGN, Ill. — The house mouse, stickleback fish and honey bee appear to have little in common, but at the genetic level these creatures respond in strikingly similar ways to danger, researchers report. When any of these animals confronts an intruder, the researchers found, many of the same genes and brain gene networks gear up or down in response.
Many critical developmental regulators are involved in differentiation of multipotent progenitor cell types and display especially dynamic expression patterns, as their differentiation roles are deployed across in different spatial locations over developmental time. In partcular, many genes associated with neurodevelopmental disorders are involved in basic processes – the timely replication of neuron progenitor cells (NPC), their differentiation into neurons or glia, the outgrowth of neurites, or formation of synapses – events that occur at different times in each region of the developing brain. The deployment of these factors at the right time and place requires the precise combinatorial action of enhancers, silencers, and other regulatory elements (REs) including some located significant genomic distances from the gene. These REs interact with each other and target promoters through the formation of chromatin loops to specify the location, time, and circumstances of the genes’ expression.
The basic mechanisms of long-distance regulation are just now beginning to be revealed, and only a few distant enhancers have been described in detail so far. However, genetic studies in humans and mice made it clear that distal REs play a much more prevalent role.
Classically, the relationship between essential genes and long-distance REs has been identified through mutations that either involve the REs themselves, or that separate REs from their cognate promoters via genome rearrangements. Our own studies have leveraged a unique collection of mouse translocation mutants for this same purpose, focusing on mutations that occur far from genes, but give rise to dramatic developmental effects. Most of the translocations we have identified are associated with neurological phenotypes, and closely model certain types of human neurodevelopmental disease.
A key example is the intense current focus of our group, a translocation called 16Gso that breaks between and dysregulates the neighboring Galnt17 and Auts2 genes. Mutations in this human region have been associated with intellectual disability (ID), autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), epilepsy, as well as depression, bipolar disorder and wide range of neurological diseases, and the AUTS2 gene has been the major focus of attention. AUTS2 is a complex gene with isoforms that are involved in different aspects of basic neuron development. Like other essential developmental genes, AUTS2 is also expressed dynamically across the brain throughout development, reflecting the gene’s essential roles in neuron development. GALNT17 had not been characterized previously, but our data show that the gene is expressed very dynamically across the developing brain, and highly co-expressed with AUTS2. We hypothesize that the two genes operate within the same functional pathways and that their expression is coordinated by a shared system of REs spread across the genomic region. We are focused on determining the details of gene function in conditional-mutant mice and in cultured neurons, and also in the characterization of the regulatory domain that controls this “neighborhood” of co-expressed neurodevelopmental genes.
We are convinced that this research has broader implications, in that regulatory mutations within co-expressed gene “neighborhoods” (more formally called topologically associating domains, or TADs) could explain many aspects of phenotypic variation associated with human neurological disease.